Transformasi kurikulum Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dalam pengembangan civic competence pada era kecerdasan artifisial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24071/usdb.v4.511Keywords:
Civic Competence, Kecerdasan Artifisial, Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Transformasi KurikulumAbstract
Perkembangan kecerdasan artifisial (AI) telah mentransformasi ekosistem pendidikan dan praktik kewarganegaraan. UNESCO, melalui survei terhadap lebih dari 450 sekolah dan perguruan tinggi, menemukan bahwa kurang dari 10% institusi memiliki kebijakan atau panduan formal mengenai penggunaan AI, yang menunjukkan kesenjangan antara akselerasi teknologi dan kesiapan institusi dalam pendidikan. Di Indonesia, Indeks Masyarakat Digital Indonesia (IMDI) 2025 mencapai 44,53, meningkat 1,19 poin dari 2024. Hal ini menunjukkan adanya peningkatan kapabilitas digital masyarakat. Kondisi tersebut menjadi tantangan bagi Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan (PKn) karena AI tidak hanya menuntut kompetensi teknologis, tetapi juga kemampuan kritis, etis, dan bertanggung jawab sebagai warga negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis arah transformasi kurikulum PKn serta konstruksi civic competence yang relevan pada era kecerdasan artifisial. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada konseptualisasi AI sebagai konteks kewarganegaraan baru dalam rekonstruksi kurikulum PKn. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi pustaka melalui analisis artikel jurnal, buku akademik, dokumen kebijakan, dan publikasi terkait kecerdasan artifisial, kurikulum, dan kewarganegaraan. Analisis data dilakukan secara tematik melalui identifikasi, kategorisasi, interpretasi, dan sintesis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa transformasi kurikulum PKn perlu bergeser dari paradigma transmisi pengetahuan menuju kurikulum transformatif, adaptif, kritis, dan etis. Konstruksi civic competence mencakup civic knowledge berupa pemahaman AI, algoritma, disinformasi, privasi, dan dampaknya terhadap demokrasi; civic skills berupa berpikir kritis, verifikasi informasi, evaluasi keluaran AI, deliberasi, dan partisipasi digital; serta civic disposition berupa integritas, tanggung jawab, empati, toleransi, kesadaran etis, dan civic virtue. Implikasi penelitian menegaskan perlunya rekonstruksi kurikulum PKn yang mengintegrasikan literasi AI, etika digital, dan civic virtue secara sistematis untuk membentuk warga negara yang kritis, etis, adaptif, dan bertanggung jawab dalam kehidupan demokratis berbasis teknologi.
Downloads
References
Altamimi, R., & Al-Haija’a, A. A. (2026). Integration of artificial intelligence competencies into a holistic digital literacy framework for middle school education. Scientific Reports, 16(1), Article 17910. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47133-1
Banks, J. A. (2017). Failed citizenship and transformative civic education. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17726741
Branson, M. S., & Quigley, C. N. (1998). The role of civic education.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Dikaiakos, M. D. (2025). Generative AI as a disinformation tool. Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science, 26(2), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.61.CON3
Farooq, A., van den Hoogen, E., Tulin, M., & de Vreese, C. (2025). Generative AI generating concerns: Citizens’ perspectives during the 2024 European elections. The International Journal of Press/Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612251376060
Fitri, Y. (2025). IMDI 2025 Naik 44,53, Indonesia makin cakap digital. Radio Republik Indonesia. https://rri.co.id/nasional/1876899/about.html
Helal, M. Y. I., Elgendy, I. A., Albashrawi, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Al-Ahmadi, M. S., & Jeon, I. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking skills: a systematic review, conceptual framework and future research directions. Information Discovery and Delivery, 54(4), 690–704. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-05-2025-0125
Kuznetsova, E., Makhortykh, M., Vziatysheva, V., Stolze, M., Baghumyan, A., & Urman, A. (2025). In generative AI we trust: Can chatbots effectively verify political information? Journal of Computational Social Science, 8, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00338-8
Łabuz, M., & Nehring, C. (2024). On the way to deep fake democracy? Deep fakes in election campaigns in 2023. European Political Science, 23(4), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-024-00482-9
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/JKJB9835
Muhamad, N. (2025). Indonesia’s digital society index score will increase in 2025. Databoks Katadata. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/en/technology-telecommunications/statistics/68e36d508d423/indonesias-digital-society-index-score-will-increase-in-2025
Naqvi, W. M., Ganjoo, R., Rowe, M., Pashine, A. A., & Mishra, G. V. (2025). Critical thinking in the age of generative AI: implications for health sciences education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 1571527. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1571527
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6
Ng, D. T. K., Wu, W., Leung, J. K. L., Chiu, T. K. F., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1082–1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13411
Shi, G., Chan, K. K., & Lin, X.-F. (2023). A systematic review of digital citizenship empirical studies for practitioners. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 3953–3975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11383-z
Sukisno, Rohid, N., Rohid, N., Syahrial, M. F., & Nurtjahyani, S. D. (2026). Integrative Artificial Intelligence in Civic Education: A Model for Future Civic Education Learning Design. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 17(2), 312–352. https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/7317
UNESCO. (2024, September 18). UNESCO survey: Less than 10% of schools and universities have formal guidance on AI. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-survey-less-10-schools-and-universities-have-formal-guidance-ai
UNESCO. (2025, 2 September). UNESCO survey: Two-thirds of higher education institutions have or are developing guidance on AI use. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-survey-two-thirds-higher-education-institutions-have-or-are-developing-guidance-ai-use
Zakaria, N. A., & Kadir, M. I. (2026). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dalam Era Digital. INOMATEC: Jurnal Inovasi Dan Kajian Multidisipliner Kontemporer, 1(03), 631–641. https://ojs.portalpublikasi.com/index.php/inomatec/article/view/696
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fakhrul Kurniawan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
