Implementation of generative artificial intelligence as co-creator to assist students in research proposal writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24071/icre.v1i1.46Keywords:
co-creator, generative artificial intelligence, research proposal, students’ responsesAbstract
The development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technology has opened up new opportunities in the field of education, serving as a collaborative partner in the learning process. This study aims to explore the implementation of GenAI as a co-creator in assisting students in writing research proposals and students’ responses to the implementation. This study is descriptive-qualitative research. The research subjects are students taking the Research Proposal course in the odd semester of 2025/2026 in the Economics Education Study Program, Sanata Dharma University. Data collection techniques include interviews and questionnaires. Result of this research are: 1) students use GenAI platforms such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Google Gemini as co-creators in various stages of research proposal writing, ranging from finding ideas, developing background, literature review, to proposal finalization; 2) Students have positive responses regarding the implementation of GenAI to assist students in writing research proposals. The positive responses are students feeling assisted in writing research proposals, students feeling confident and self-assured, students being able to write research proposals with better quality, and students having enough time to finish proposal. This research contributes to developing innovative learning that integrates artificial intelligence in education, while providing practical recommendations for educational institutions in adopting GenAI technology.
Downloads
References
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Initial policy considerations for generative artificial intelligence (OECD Publication). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DAF/AS/POL(2023)6&docLanguage=En
Shneiderman, B. (2020). Human-centered artificial intelligence: Reliable, safe & trustworthy. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(6), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kurnia Martikasari, Dominikus Arif Budi Prasetyo (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
