CHINA ACTION IN WATERS AROUND NATUNA, A CHALLENGE TO INDONESIA’S BLUE ECONOMY SOVEREIGNTY

Antonius Diksa Kuntara

doi:10.24071/icebmr.v3i1.102

Authors

Antonius Diksa Kuntara National Cheng Kung University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24071/icebmr.v3i1.102

Keywords:

Natuna Island, South China Sea, China, Indonesia, Hedging strategy

Abstract

Southeast Asia nations have experienced several confrontations with China in waters around “South China Sea”. In 2020, Indonesia lodged a protest to the United Nations regarding China’s action of placing dozens of Chinese fishing vessels with coast guard on waters near Natuna Island. China claimed the location as its sovereignty using a traditional “Nine Dash Line” argument. Indonesia then countered with placing warships and F-16 fighter to patrol the region. This article analyses the event using politico-historical approach to understand the characteristic of China’s behavior. China had developed into modern country with strong confident nature. Its strong economic development compared to those of the Southeast Asia nations allegedly played role in policing the action. China’s Belt and Road Initiatives (BRI) project which collaborated with around 120 countries made it stronger in its global influence. With this superiority, China could be thinking that Southeast Asia nations will weaken its stance if facing a conflict with the country. However, in the incident in the waters around Natuna in 2020, Indonesia took a “no compromise” stance – different from that of other neighbouring Southeast Asian country had taken - clearly marked the balancing strategy. This action can be said as a sturdy effort to secure Indonesia’s Blue Economy plan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anwar, D.F. (2024). “Indonesia’s Path Between the Reefs, Why Jakarta Won’t Abandon Its Foreign Policy of Nonalignment”. Foreign Affairs, 12 February 2024.

Ariadno, M.K. (2016). “Menjawab Provokasi Tiongkok di Laut Natuna”. Online Publication by Law Department, University of Indonesa April 04 th, 2016. https://law.ui.ac.id/v3/menjawab-provokasi-tiongkok-di-laut-natuna-2/ (accessed at 14 April 2020)

Beja, J.P. (2018). “Reform, Repression, Co-optation”, in Routledge Handbook of The Chinese Communist Party (Willy Wo Lap Lam (ed)), New York: Routledge, page 232-247

Baum, R. and Bennet, L. (eds.), (1971). China in Ferment, Perspectives on the Cultural Revolution. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Brandt, C., Schwartz, B., and Fairbank, J.K. (1952). A Documentary History of Chinese Communism. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Briere, C. (2021). “Archival Research” in Morin, J.F., Olsson, C. and Atikcan, E.O, Research Methods in the Social Sciences, an A-Z of Key Concepts, Oxford UK: Oxford University Press, p. 10-13.

Caruana, A. (2023). “Nine-Dash-Line”, Maritime Affairs Program (MAP) Handbill Spotlight. Volume 2, Issue 7 of the ICAS MAP Handbill, July 25, 2023. https://chinausicas.org/research/map-spotlight-nine-dash-line/ (accessed at 24 May 2024).

Chao, W. C., (2021). “The Philippines’ Perception and Strategy for China’s Belt and Road Initiative Expansion: Hedging with Balancing”, The Chinese Economy. 54 (1), January.

Chin, K. F. (2021). Malaysia’s Perception and Strategy toward China’s BRI Expansion: Continuity or Change? The Chinese Economy. 54 (1), January.

Claude, Jr, I.L., (1989). ‘The Balance of Power Revisited’, Review of International Studies 15(2), pp. 77–85;

Dickson, B. J. (2016). The Dictator’s Dilemma: The Chinese Communist Party’s Strategy for Survival. New York: Oxford University Press.

Dreyer, J. T. (2019). China’s Political System: Modernization and Tradition, 10th edition. New York and London: Routledge

Foreign Language Press, (1961). Selected Works of Mao Tse-Tung. Peking China: People’s Publishing House

Gladney, D.C. (2018). The party-state’s nationalist strategy to control the Uighur, in Routledge Handbook of The Chinese Communist Party (Willy Wo Lap Lam (ed)), New York: Routledge, page 312-332

Grossman, D. (2020). Why Is China Pressing Indonesia Again Over Its Maritime Claims? World Politics Review, Thursday, Jan. 16, 2020. https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/28476/why-is-china-pressing-indonesiaagain-over-the-natuna-islands accessed at April 13, 2020

Iksan, M. & Soong, J.J, (2022). The Political Economy of Indonesia’s Development Strategy under China-USA Power Rivalry and Hegemonic Competition: A Middle Power with Its Hedging Strategy, The Chinese Economy, DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2022.2136696

Kristianto, Y. I. A. (2020). Target Provokasi Cina di Natuna. detikNews. 31 Jan 2020 https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-4880695/target-provokasi-cina-di-natuna accessed at 14 April 2020

Kuik, C. C., (2016). How Do Weaker States Hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China, Journal of Contemporary China, 25:100, 500-514, DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2015.1132714

Kuntowijoyo, (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Tiara Wacana.

Lam, W. W. L. (ed.) (2018), Routledge Handbook of The Chinese Communist Party. New York: Routledge

Lyon, P. (1968). “Neutrality, Neutralism, Non-alignment”, International Relations 3(6), pp. 444–450.

Martin, L. (ed.), (1962). Neutralism and Nonalignment: The New States in World Affairs. Westport, Ct: Greenwood, for the Washington Center of Foreign Policy Research.

Mursitama, T. N. & Ying, Y., (2021). “Indonesia’s Perception and Strategy toward China’s OBOR”, The Chinese Economy. 54 (1), January.

Nexon, D.H., (2009). ‘The Balance of Power in the Balance’, World Politics 61(2), (April 2009), pp. 330–359

Paul, T.V., Wirtz, J.J., and Fortmann, M. (eds), (2004). Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

Pelkmans, J., (2019). “Understanding the ASEAN economic community: pragmatism versus conceptualism”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 25:5, 619-636

Punyaratabandhu, P. & Swaspitchayaskun, J. (2021). "Thailand’s Perception and Strategy toward China’s BRI Expansion: Hedging with Cooperating," The Chinese Economy, 54(1), pp. 69-77, January

Shahab, Nabiha, (2020). Indonesia’s Natuna Challenge, Illegal fishing – including by Chinese vessels – continues to be a problem in the Natuna Sea. The Diplomat. March 13, 2020. https://thediplomat.com/2020/03/indonesias-natuna-challenge/ accessed at April 13, 2020

Snyder, G.H., (1997). Alliance Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Soong, J. J. (2021). Perception and Strategy of ASEAN’s States on China’s Footprints under Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Perspectives of State-Society-Business with Balancing-Bandwagoning-Hedging Consideration. The Chinese Economy, 54(1), pp. 1–8. January. DOI: 10.1080/10971475.2020.1809813

Soong, J.J. & Aung, K.H. (2021). “Myanmar’s Perception and Strategy toward China’s BRI Expansion on Three Major Projects Development: Hedging Strategic Framework with State-Market-Society Analysis”, The Chinese Economy. 54 (1), January.

Torou, E., Kativari, A., Vassilakis, C., Lepouras, G., and Halatsis, C. (2010). “Historical Research in Archives. User Methodology and Supporting Tools.” International Journal on Digital Libraries, 11 (1), pp. 25-36

Vu, V. H, Soong, J.J., and Nguyen, K.N., (2021). “Vietnam’s Perceptions and Strategies toward China’s Belt and Road Initiative Expansion: Hedging with Resisting.” The Chinese Economy. 54 (1), January.

Walt, S.M., (1987). The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.